Check out the A&B portal!

Competition for Wyspianski Museum settled!

14 of October '19

On Friday, October 11, 2019, at a gala ceremony at the Juliusz Słowacki Theater, the results of the competition to develop an architectural and urban design concept for the Stanislaw Wyspianski Museum, a branch of the National Museum in Krakow, were announced. The competition was an execution-based, two-stage competition. Five teams qualified for the second stage. The jury awarded two prizes and honorable mentions to the participants of the first stage. From October 14, 2019, a post-competition exhibition opens at the Feliks Jasieński Szołayski Tenement House at 9 Szczepanski Square.

Competition Jury:

  1. Maciej Miłobędzki, KSK SARP Warsaw Branch, Competition Judge Chairman.
  2. Marcin Brataniec, KSK SARP Oddział Kraków, Competition Judge Referee
  3. Prof. Rainer Mahlamäki, Finland, Foreign Competition Judge
  4. Simon Ewings, United Kingdom/Norway, Foreign Competition Judge
  5. Jacek Droszcz, KSK SARP Wybrzeże Branch
  6. Olaf Jasnorzewski, representative of MPOIA RP
  7. Łukasz Gaweł, Ph.D., MNK, Deputy Director for Strategy, Development and Communications
  8. Magdalena Czubińska, MNK, Plenipotentiary of the Director for Exhibition Activities
  9. Daniel Hankus, MNK, Head of Technical Department

Deputy Competition Judges:

  1. Dr. Rafał Zawisza, KSK SARP Kraków Branch
  2. Paweł Orkisz, MNK, Deputy Director for Management.

Competition Secretariat:

  1. Marek Kaszyński, SARP Branch Krakow, Organizational Secretary of the Competition
  2. Benita Strzałka, SARP Krakow Branch, Assistant Secretary of the Competition

taras

First Prize: Heinle, Wischer und Partner Architects

First prize

Heinle, Wischer und Partner Architects
Author team: Edzard Schultz, Anna Stryszewska-Słońska
co-authors: Katarzyna Skowronek, Marta Wróblewska, Łukasz Umiński, Łukasz Kaczmarek, Melina Haures

Justification of the Jury
The first prize was awarded for:

  1. creative continuation of the concept of the study from Stage 1 of the Competition, which resulted in interesting solutions in terms of elevation and disposition of internal spaces
  2. clear structure and tectonics of the building, universal modular exhibition spaces
  3. a successful composition of two offset longitudinal blocks forming a very good relationship with the National Museum Main Building and creating an attractive space of the entrance square
  4. clear and restrained form of the project presentation

The Competition Jury's recommendations for the competition work that received the First Prize

  1. The Competition Jury recommends resigning from lowering the level of the entrance to the Wyspianski Museum below the level of the existing square, in order to better connect the building with its surroundings, especially with the garden. In this connection, it is recommended to analyze the possibility of increasing the height of the building to the acceptable possible parameters.
  2. The Competition Jury sees no need for movable ceilings in the Wyspianski Museum.
  3. The competition court shares the opinion on the choice of natural stone as a facade material
    façade, but recommends further analysis of the material in adjustment to budgetary and climatic conditions.
  4. The competition court draws attention to the concept of heating the building with ventilation and air-conditioning systems, in which the use of the building's thermal mass to shape the interior climate should be considered.
  5. The competition court draws attention to the necessity of maintaining the budget regime in further design phases.

2 nagroda

Second prize: BBGK Architects

2nd prize

BBGK Architects

Authors: Jan Belina-Brzozowski, Konrad Grabowiecki, Wojciech Kotecki
Authors'cooperation: Piotr Musiałowski, Filip Strzelecki, Martyna Dryś, Dawid Roszkowski, Paweł Dobrowolski, Landscape Architecture Studio: Marta Tomasik, Magdalena Romanowska, Marek Rozbicki, Adam Grabowski, Piotr Pachowski, Marcin Mucha

Justification of the Jury
The second prize was awarded for:

  1. architectural form enabling an interesting concept of combining the public spaces of the building with the garden surroundings, the museum forum and the landscape
  2. the expressive formula of the building's body clad in an undulating "curtain", which is an interesting counterpoint to the monumental museum edifice. The Competition Jury appreciated the idea contained in the study at the first stage of the Competition, including very good solutions in terms of aesthetics, especially in terms of the sensitive design of the gardens, but did not see sufficient development of the Competition work at the second stage of the Competition.

Competition Court's recommendations for the Competition work that received the Second Prize

  1. The Competition Court recommends reconsidering the location and proportions of the "heart" of the exposition
  2. The Competition Court recommends varying the height of the exposition spaces and the use of openings and spatial interrelations between the lobby and the exposition spaces where possible
  3. The Competition Court recommends further work on the facades of the building to make the facade lighter in expression
  4. It is recommended to provide an exit for cars by a ramp and to abandon the car elevator
  5. It would be advisable to consider using the thermal mass of the building to shape the interior climate.
  6. The competition court notes the need to maintain the budget regime in further phases of design


The following teams also qualified for the second stage

Analog

Qualification for the second stage: ANALOG Piotr Śmierzewski

ANALOG Piotr Śmierzewski
Authors: Piotr Śmierzewski, Michał Czeszejko-Sochacki, Katarzyna Maliszewska, Rafał Śliwa

Justification for granting an invitation to the second stage of the Competition:

for a very clear spatial disposition of two cuboid blocks thoughtfully and successfully linked compositionally to the museum forum and the landscape assumption of the Błonia; for the solution of exhibition spaces allowing flexible and diverse exhibition arrangements, a good exposition of large-format works of Wyspianski; for a synthetic and elegant record of the architectural idea.

Konsorcjum

Qualification for the second stage: Q-Arch CONSORTIUM, VISION

Q-Arch CONSORTIUM, VISION

author: Stanislaw Deńko
co-authors: Robert Kuzianik, Anna Socha, Karol Korycki, Robert Ciuła
cooperation: Stanisław Gorczowski, Anna Ostrowska, Iwona Syga, Michael Avetisian, Alicja Wąś
cooperation in industry solutions: Czesław Hodurek, Paweł Budziński, Ireneusz Nowak, Jan Wachacki, Jerzy Wójcik, Katarzyna Waga
visualizations: Nguyen Minh Hoang
model: Jan Gottwald

Justification for granting an invitation to the second stage of the Competition:

For appropriate decisions on the arrangement of functional elements and their interrelationships; for good connection with the public space of the Museum Quarter

ZSK Architekci

Qualification for the second stage: JSK Architects

JSK Architects

Authors: Mariusz Rutz, Zbigniew Pszczulny, Piotr Bury, Jakub Podgórski, Marcin Bieńka

Justification for granting an invitation to the second stage of the Competition:

for proposing an open first floor space intermingling with the surroundings and creating a friendly public space complementing the square of the planned museum quarter; for proposing an attractive architectural form; for appropriate solutions for the main exhibition space


Honorable mentions

were awarded to participants not invited to submit competition works in the second stage of the Competition, who submitted the following study studies in the first stage

Machulik

Honorable Mention - study paper in the first stage of the Competition: Zak Zak Architektury Mikołaj Machulik

Department of Architecture Mikolaj Machulik

Authors: Mikołaj Machulik, Jacek Krych, Joanna Urbanowicz, Michał Nawrot, Sabrina Tkaczuk, Paulina Kremska

Justification for awarding the honor:

For an attempt at sculptural but restrained shaping of the Museum's body.

Kozielewicz

honorable mention - study in the first stage of the Competition: CAVU Architects

CAVU Architects

Authors: Krzysztof Kozielewicz, Marcin Pawłowski, Jarosław Wilk
cooperation: Michał Kołodziej, Monika Kozielewicz, Maria Trawińska

Justification for the award:

For very good solutions of the exhibition space with the exhibition of stained glass projects.

HRA Architekci

honorable mention - study in the first stage of the Competition: HRA Architects

HRA Architects

Authors: Wojciech Hermanowicz, Błażej Hermanowicz, Stanisław Rewski

Justification for awarding the distinction:

For a clear spatial disposition, an interesting concept of the museum garden and its relationship with the public zone of the museum quarter.

elaborated by: Malgorzata TOMCZAK

The vote has already been cast

INSPIRATIONS